Before dissecting Bigg Boss specifically, it’s crucial to address the broader issue of reality shows. Research has indicated that exposure to shows featuring relational aggression. Even for as little as 40 minutes, it can contribute to increased aggression in viewers. This raises concerns about the role such shows play in shaping societal behaviors and attitudes.
One glaring aspect of Bigg Boss is its choice of participants, often individuals from the fringes of the glamour world—those seeking a second chance at fame or those capable of creating the sensational drama that audiences crave. In recent seasons, even commoners have entered the fray, leveraging the platform for a brief moment in the spotlight. This raises questions about the authenticity and integrity of the show’s participants.
The allure of Bigg Boss extends beyond the narrative of human psychology and into the realm of voyeurism. While viewers may believe they are gaining insights into human behavior, the reality is often far from that. The show capitalizes on the pleasure derived from watching individuals engage in toxic behavior, creating an environment where people are pulled down, humiliated, and forced into conflicts.
Watching Bigg Boss can inadvertently fuel a twisted form of the God complex among viewers. The joy derived from predicting the fate of contestants and proclaiming their deserved eliminations mirrors a form of psychological superiority, akin to playing judge and jury over the lives of those on screen. This dynamic adds a concerning layer to the show’s influence on viewer psychology.
Beyond physical and sexual sadism, Bigg Boss introduces a new dimension: mental sadism. The pleasure derived from witnessing contestants cause emotional pain to others becomes a form of entertainment. Instances of contestants belittling and tormenting each other are not exceptions but rather the norm, creating an environment that thrives on mental cruelty.
In the 11 seasons of Bigg Boss, the show has evolved into a platform that fosters unhealthy behaviors, promotes sadism, and exploits the vulnerabilities of its participants. The role of the host, Salman Khan, as a judge and executioner, adds another layer of concern. As viewers, it’s crucial to question the ethical implications of supporting a show that perpetuates toxicity and sadism. Perhaps it’s time for a collective reevaluation of our television choices, steering away from content that thrives on the degradation and humiliation of individuals for the sake of entertainment.